I like Connect Group. I like Connect Group because it’s a solid, old-fashioned value investment; you’re buying it at 7.5x earnings (6.5x yesterday!), and you’re buying into what is basically a monopoly operating in a declining industry. Ok, technically they’re a duopoly, but the market is geographically split – so where they’re operate, they’re really the big dog. And being a monopoly in a declining industry is a pretty attractive place to be, since the lack of competition means you can derive great returns. Your competitors have left the market by force or by choice, and who’s going to spend the money competing with an incumbent in an industry on the way down?
A long-standing manager with a superb track record. An organisation at the top of its field, with vocal fans handsomely rewarded with continuing success. Then the wheels come off; the boss totters off into the blissful sunset, and his replacement at the reigns does nothing but disappoint. Probably no surprise – reversion to the mean, and all. Anyway, the new guy doesn’t last long before a third manager comes along promising to turn the ship around, and only a few weeks into his leadership we’re reminded that we are still far from the glory days.
Yes, like you, I was pretty shocked when I woke up this morning to the news that Manchester United had lost last night to Leicester – and let in 5 goals in the process! There’s some rot at that organisation, I tell you.
It’s not as if they haven’t spent serious cash, either – though probably not in the right places. Investment probably could’ve been more optimised; they needed to stay on top of the game in their core areas, but instead overspent on ambition at the more exciting end of the spectrum.
Earlier today, as I was pondering the quality of businesses - you will have noticed my style involves quite a lot of pondering and not too much doing, which may be a failing of mine – I stumbled came across a great article on a blog from 2011. I don’t know how I found it; sleepy little blogs come and go, after all, and lots of great ones languish in hidden corners of the internet… but this one made me smile.
It provided a better explanation of the value of high return companies than I could ever write and is a highly recommended read. Even more thought provoking, though, is the follow-up. Here, the author more or less runs through his take on the holy grail of investing; not just which companies generate super-normal returns on capital, which ‘any computer could do’, but why certain companies or industries generate consistently high returns. He uses airlines as an example of an industry which is basically structurally rigged to generate poor returns. See his intro, noting the following:
Clearly, now I work in the city (boo hiss), I spend even longer looking at shares than I ever had the opportunity to before. It drills some points home, because it’s given me longer to look at a whole bunch of stocks I never even considered before – ones that aren’t traditional value plays in my little niche, for instance, along with business models I never took the time to understand and geographies I never had the inclination to play around in.
If there’s one overarching message I take away from looking at loads of businesses, it’s this:
Really good companies – companies which return significantly above their cost of capital over the cycle – are incredible hard to find**. I don’t mean that on a valuation basis; I’m not necessarily trying to say that great companies are difficult to find because they’re usually too expensive, though that’s also true. I mean it on an absolute level – companies which have good return profiles, competitive advantages, competent management and are in a market which is, at least, not dying off – are just very hard to find full stop.
In the interest of intellectual honesty, I should say I’ve been pretty positive on Tesco for a long time – most of the way down, to be honest, so I was a little sheepish after Tesco released yet another poor trading statement last week. The behemoth seems to lurch from wound to wound, dragging more investors down with it, and tanking sentiment along the way. Not many people are sticking up for it at the moment.
I have to say, I disliked the trading update too – though maybe for different reasons to most people. I’m completely with cutting the dividend – absolutely no problem – and the trading profit figure for the year looks fine, too. Entirely unsurprising. What I really dislike, though, is the line that they’re ‘implementing further reductions in capital expenditure’. I’m no expert – far from it – I’m just an interested observer. What I really can’t abide, though, is having no idea what’s going on at a company. Clarke, the outward CEO, was talking about the need for a wide-ranging store refresh – something which I shrugged and probably agreed with.